|

SWAROVSKI BIRDING COMMUNITY E-BULLETIN
DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE NORTH AMERICAN SWAROVSKI BIRDING COMMUNITY
*Information, communication, and inspiration on birds, wildlife, and nature*
***************
July 2004
***************
***************
WELCOME!
Welcome
to the third of our "Swarovski Birding Community E-bulletins" for
North America. This monthly communication is intended to keep friends
and associates informed about the developing plans for the Swarovski
Birding Community in North America. The E-bulletin will have information
about planned SBC activities, along with keeping you abreast of
important birding and bird conservation news.
This
month is "National Parks and Recreation Month," which is intended
to showcase and invite community participation in quality leisure
activities for all segments of the population. For us, of course,
"quality leisure activity" means birding!
(return to table of contents)
RARITY
FOCUS
The
"Rarity Focus" for June is Black-headed Nightingale-Thrush, a Mexican
species which appeared in Pharr, in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas,
during the last days of May and remained on site for the entire
month of June. The bird was found at the Allen Williams' residence
at 750 Sam Houston Avenue in Pharr. This is the same location where
a Blue Mockingbird has made off-again-on-again appearances for many
months.
The
identification of the Black-headed Nightingale-Thrush is unequivocal.
However, on the U.S./Mexican border, anytime a new species that
has a predominantly Mexican distribution shows up, birders wrestle
with the issue of the bird's origin. This is because of the continuing,
illegal traffic in native bird species for the caged bird trade
in Mexican border towns. The question of whether the Black-headed
Nightingale-Thrush is officially a new species in North America
will be an issue the Texas Bird Records Committee and the ABA Checklist
Committee to determine.
Interested
readers may find additional information about the Black-headed Nightingale-Thrush
in the field guides by Peterson & Chalif (plate 35, page 187)
and Howell & Webb (plate 50, page 586). It should be noted that
the species is found in humid subtropical forests from central Tamaulipas,
Mexico, south to western Panama. It is resident in the southern
part of its range but is migratory in northern regions. Precisely
where the population goes that departs from the cloud forests of
the Sierra Madre Oriental, where the species is the most common
breeding species in the forests, is not known, but it is probably
within the range of resident populations. There is also a disjunct
population in the lower Sierra de Tamaulipas, near the coast north
of Tampico. Since there is no cloud forest in that portion of the
range, the Black-headed Nightingale-Thrushes there inhabits a semi-humid
pine-oak/tropical transition forest.
The
bird in Pharr appears at the Williams' birdbath in the thicket behind
the house most evenings. The residence is located between the "Senior
Friends Nursing Home" and the "Skinner-Silva Funeral Home." Arrangements
to visit the Williams' residence can be made by calling Allen Williams
at 956/460-9864.
Assuming
that the TBRC accepts this record, it would be a first for the ABA
Area. Robert Tizard has posted photos of the nightingale-thrush
(and a photo of the Blue Mockingbird) on
the Web.
(return to table of contents)
DIGISCOPING
Banding,
digiscoping, and e-mail communication fortuitously combined in May
to provide a fascinating story about the longevity and migration
of Red Knots. On Tuesday afternoon, 18 May, while conducting shorebird
surveys between Florida's Bird Islands and Fort George Inlet, near
Jacksonville, Patrick and Doris Leary noticed a banded Red Knot
with "a strange gray-colored marker" on its leg. The bird was digiscoped,
and the resulting images were immediately e-mailed to Brian Harrington
at the Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences in Massachusetts.
From the unique, hand-made, flag marker and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) band affixed to this bird, Harrington was able to
identify the year that this Red Knot was banded, although not the
precise individual bird.
Harrington
confirmed that the knot was one banded by his shorebird team in
1984 in Lagoa do Peixe in southern Brazil. At the time of banding
the bird was an adult, so Harrington postulates that the bird is
at least 21 years old, thus very likely making it the oldest Red
Knot on record. More incredibly, this bird may have logged nearly
400,000 migration miles over the course of its lifetime! "It is
a champion migrant," Harrington said, noting that even though this
species is known for its remarkable flights, this particular individual
has an exceptional history. Harrington also commented, "By its 13th
birthday, this Red Knot, weighing only about 4.5 ounces, had migrated
a distance equal to the moon and back."
This
entire event represents an extraordinary mix of 20th-century banding
techniques and early 21st-century digital technology. John James
Audubon's early crude experiments with silver leg bands on Eastern
Phoebes in the Philadelphia area in the early 1800s have "come a
very long way, indeed" according to Patrick Leary.
For
get more details and see accompanying photos of this remarkable
knot, click here.
For
more information about color-banded and color-flagged shorebirds
click here.
(return to table of contents)
BIRD
CONSERVATION NOTES
MIGRATORY
BIRD HUNTING AND CONSERVATION STAMP - This month, a new "Federal
Duck Stamp" has become available at post offices, national wildlife
refuges, some national retail chain stores, and various sporting-goods
stores nationwide.
The
Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp, the stamp's official
name, has enjoyed an imposing success during its 70-year history.
Initiated in the mid-1930s to address a major crisis in bird conservation
and wetland habitat loss, the stamp has been a highly effective
funding mechanism for the National Wildlife Refuge System. The more
than $670 million raised from stamp sales have been used to secure
more than five million acres of valuable wetland habitat for the
Refuge System. Approximately $25 million a year is currently collected
through annual stamp sales.
Proceeds
from the purchase price of the $15 stamp go into the Migratory Bird
Conservation Fund, which is used to purchase valuable wetlands for
the Refuge System. In fact, approximately 98 percent of the revenue
from the stamp go through the Migratory Bird Conservation Fund to
purchases refuge wetlands. Importantly for birders, the stamp can
be used between July of this year through June of 2005 to gain admission
to any National Wildlife Refuge in the country that charges an entry
fee.
Concerned
birders are increasingly engaged in discussions about ways in which
the stamp might be expanded beyond the vital, but limited, purpose
of refuge wetland habitat acquisition. Among the changes that some
active birders hope to see incorporated into the program are: 1)
inclusion of more species than simply waterfowl, 2) acquisition
of habitat types in addition to wetlands, and 3) the support of
a broader public constituency.
1)
More Species: In 1934 bird-conservation visionaries created
the stamp when North American waterfowl populations were in deep
crisis. The stamp and the Refuge System succeeded splendidly in
helping save waterfowl. Today, additional bird species are in similar
trouble. If these additional species could be properly highlighted,
their conservation and management needs could conceivably be addressed
through stamp sales.
2)
More Habitat and Causes: The stamp has been a mainstay for
refuge wetland habitat acquisition. The fact is, however, that additional
upland habitats might also be able to benefit from stamp-funding
sources. Furthermore, other bird-conservation causes could benefit
through sales of the stamp, such as increased development of the
bird plans (e.g., Partners in Flight, the Waterbird Plan, the U.S.
Shorebird Plan), a supplement to the Neotropical Migratory Bird
Fund, the promotion of International Migratory Bird Day, and/or
additional funding for the North American Wetlands Conservation
Act.
3)
A Broader Constituency: Waterfowl hunters cannot do it alone.
By including a broader constituency, such as the birding community,
sale of the stamp could significantly increase its usefulness and
its value.
Finally,
implicit in a retooled stamp would need to be a willingness to modify
the artwork on the current stamp along with giving the stamp greater
value. Modifying the artwork might mean cycling of the art through
other family groups beyond waterfowl (e.g., shorebirds, passerines,
raptors, upland gamebirds, and other waterbirds) or including other
bird species on the stamp alongside the traditional waterfowl. Giving
the stamp added value could also mean using it as an expanded entrance
pass elsewhere or a de facto "discount card," something that would
be valuable for waterfowl hunters and non-hunters alike.
Essential,
even to modest changes in the stamp, must be an assurance that the
legacy and grand achievements of the existing stamp are appreciated
and maintained. Any changes in the stamp must build on the stamp's
existing success and only serve to strengthen its foundations while
not neglecting its past success. This is why an expanded stamp,
not a "new alternative," has been proposed. Any expanded or revised
approach would be predicated on "wetlands first." Only if a revised
stamp could provide historic revenue amounts would proceeds from
sale of the new stamp go toward supporting additional bird-conservation
concerns.
Beyond
the recent discussion over forging a retooled Migratory Bird Hunting
and Conservation Stamp, all concerned birders should support the
current stamp by purchasing one this month. For more details on
birders and the stamp, click here.
(return to table of contents)
NEW
HAMPSHIRE MOVES TO GET THE LEAD OUT - Effective January 2005,
a new state law in New Hampshire will expand the prohibition on
using certain sizes of lead sinkers and jigs on all freshwaters
in the state, and will ban the sale of this gear statewide beginning
January 2006.
The
New Hampshire Fish and Game Department has for years encouraged
anglers to dispose of old lead sinkers and jigs and replace them
with non-lead alternatives because of the health hazard that lead
tackle presents for loons and other wildlife. In 2000, New Hampshire
became the first state to ban the use of lead sinkers of one ounce
or less and jigs less than one inch long on freshwater lakes and
ponds. The new law will extend the ban to rivers and streams, effectively
making the tackle illegal to use on any freshwater body in the state.
"The
new law is an important step in continuing to reduce human impacts
on wildlife. The earlier law and educational campaign alerted people
to the dangers of lead tackle to wildlife and the ready availability
of non-lead alternatives, but the reality is that loons are still
dying from lead poisoning," said John Kanter, Coordinator of New
Hampshire Fish and Game's Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program.
Loons
that die from ingesting lead sinkers or jigs usually die within
a matter of weeks. It is believed that loons and other waterbirds
ingest lead by eating fish that have swallowed lead sinkers, by
striking at jigs pulled through the water, or simply by picking
up the tackle as they sift through mud at the bottom of lakes for
pebbles and grit needed to aid their digestion. Lead poisoning accounted
for more than half of the loon deaths analyzed in a research project
conducted by the Loon Preservation Committee and Tufts University.
Most
anglers have been supportive about making the change from lead tackle.
According to Mark Beauchesne, coordinator of New Hampshire's Let's
Go Fishing program, "Anglers know that it's the right thing to do
and continue to do their part by using the many great alternatives
to lead tackle that are now available."
For
details on the state's Loon Preservation Committee, click here.
Elsewhere
in the U.S., Maine, Massachusetts, and, most recently, New York
already restrict the use of lead sinkers and jigs.
In
the meantime, Canadians are also moving in the direction to ban
lead in fishing gear. Some provinces already restrict lead gear,
and Canada's Minister of the Environment, David Anderson, recently
announced that he would soon propose regulations that will bring
about an eventual countrywide ban on the import, manufacture, and
sale of fishing sinkers and jigs containing lead.
(return to table of contents)
WESTERN
ALASKA UNDER THE RADAR ON THE NPR-A -
In 1976, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) was given jurisdiction
over the 23.5-million-acre National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska
(NPR-A) formerly administered by the Navy. Four years later, Congress
authorized leasing and development, but directed the Department
of the Interior to minimize ecological disturbances. Since then,
the area has been the object of a series of leasing openings and
compromises, the most important of which was settled in 1998, balancing
energy development and natural considerations, opening up for drilling
some 87 percent of 4.6 million acres in the Northeast portion of
the NRP-A.
Early
last month, the BLM in Alaska released their revised development
plan for the Northeast portion of the NPR-A, a plan which could
now open a large portion of the Teshekpuk Lake Special Area, thereby
potentially subjecting 387,000 acres previously closed to drillers
in the 1998 compromise. The area in question is a productive bird
and wildlife area. For example 30 percent of all Pacific Brant,
tens of thousands of Greater White Fronted Geese, smaller populations
of Spectacled, Steller's, and King Eiders, along with nesting loons,
other waterfowl, and shorebirds habitually use this area.
The
BLM's recommended plan is "below the radar" for most Americans,
with all the required public hearings, except for one, taking place
in Alaska. Indeed, the energy industry is calling for even more
leasing, exceeding the BLM's new recommended limits.
For
the BLM plan click here.
For
a view critical of the BLM plan click here.
(return to table of contents)
BALD
EAGLE DELISTING DRAWS CLOSER - The Bald Eagle, perhaps the quintessential
North American species whose decline helped establish the Endangered
Species Act and helped to ban DDT, may drop off the threatened species
list later this year, Bush administration officials have claimed.
If
this happens, the birds still would be safeguarded under the federal
Bald Eagle Protection Act passed in 1940 and amended multiple times
(e.g., 1962, 1972, 1978), a law which prohibits killing or selling
the animals. The Interior Department will outline its plans this
summer after taking public comment on how to protect the birds'
habitat, while also recognizing that its population has recovered.
"The more species that we get off the list that are ready to be
recovered, the more we can start focusing on those that are not
quite there and ultimately move them off the list as well," said
Craig Manson, the Interior Department's Assistant Secretary for
Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
The
widespread use of DDT after World War II resulted in eggshell thinning,
which ultimately caused a crash in eagle productivity. The Bald
Eagle was reduced to just 417 known breeding pairs in the lower-48
states by 1963. By the late 1970s, the bird was endangered in 43
states and threatened in five others. By 1995, however, the species
was reclassified as threatened throughout the lower-48 states. Bald
Eagles were never deemed to be in danger in Alaska.
The
delisting process for the Bald Eagle began over four years ago,
but is taking far longer than originally expected. Drafting a five-year,
post-recovery plan for such a species with such a huge range requires
updated counts for every state, and eagle-protection rules already
in place in some states have made the bureaucratic process even
more difficult. Some observers also think the move toward delisting
is premature, with the species not doing as well as claimed in the
West.
(return to table of contents)
MBTA
CLARIFICATION AND NMBCA REAUTHORIZATION - Until recently, the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) has been interpreted as excluding
all introduced, non-native birds from protection. In the decision
Hill v. Norton (D.C. Circuit 2001), however, the court ruled that
the MBTA actually did apply to the exotic, non-native Mute Swan,
and subsequent decisions have blocked all efforts to control this
species. The case turned conventional wisdom on its head, and now
Congress has to clarify the intent of the MBTA.
The
U.S. Senate is considering S. 2547, legislation that is exactly
the same as HR 4114 being considered in the House. The legislation
would clearly remove all non-native, introduced species from the
MBTA.
The
legislation would also renew the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation
Act (NMBCA) to raise authorized funding from the current $5 million
to $15 million, lower matching requirements from 3-1 to 1-1, add
Canada to coverage, and increase administrative costs for the USFWS
to at least $125,000 from the current $80,000.
These
combined measures are receiving wide support among bird conservationists.
(return to table of contents)
ODDS
& ENDS
MORE
ON SAGE-GROUSE
- Last month we reported on the status of sage-grouse, and growing
concerns on their status. Now the "Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation
Assessment" is finished and available through the Nevada
Department of Wildlife web site, where the document is currently
available for light reading - all 610 pages! Kudos to John Connelly
(ID), Steve Knick (ID), Mike Schroeder (WA), and San Stiver (AZ)
for their efforts.
(return to table of contents)
BIRDING
AT THE G-8 IN GEORGIA - During the 30th Annual G-8 Summit at
Sea Island, Georgia, in early June, U.S. First Lady, Laura Bush,
asked Victor Emanuel (head of Victor Emanuel Nature Tours - VENT)
to lead a birdwalk for the spouses of the leaders of the G-8. The
event took place on the morning of June 9. Madame Bernadette Chirac,
Mrs. Cherie Blair, and Mrs. Ludmila Putin joined Victor and Laura
Bush for the birdwalk. Victor co-led the walk with Stacia Hendricks,
Naturalist for Sea Island Company. Among the highlights on the walk
were Tricolored Heron and Snowy Egret feeding side-by-side, male
and female Wood Ducks, recently hatched baby Killdeer, a two-and-a-half-foot
Yellow Rat Snake, an American Alligator, and both larvae and adults
of the handsome Gulf Fritillary butterfly.
On
a more personal note, Victor Emanuel was recently recognized by
his receiving the "Roger Tory Peterson Award" from the American
Birding Association for his promotion of birding, and the "Arthur
Allen Award" from the Cornell Lab of Ornithology for making ornithology
more accessible to the general public.
(return to table of contents)
POSTER-WINNERS
FOR "CATS INDOORS"
- The children's poster-winners for the American Bird Conservancy's
"2004 National Keep Your Cat Indoors Day" can be viewed here.
The Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources conducted
a state-wide poster competition this year and submitted the three
winning posters. Also received were many fine posters from local
competitions in Florida and Arizona, along with the state-wide competition
sponsored by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Nongame
Wildlife Program. Details and winning posters from the Minnesota
competition can be viewed here.
(return to table of contents)
CONDOR
CORRECTION AND UPDATE - We had a typo in June in the item on
California Condors. The male condor, AC9, is not 2 years old, but
is actually 24 years old. In the meantime, two condor pairs in northern
Arizona, incubating eggs this year have now produced young, confirmed
by using behavioral observations of adult birds as an indicator.
One condor chick was produced at a nest site in Grand Canyon National
Park, while the second chick was produced at a nest site located
on the BLM's Vermilion Cliffs National Monument. This marks the
second consecutive year wild California Condors have been hatched
in Arizona since releases began in 1996.
(return to table of contents)
***************
We
welcome your distribution of all or parts of this E-bulletin, only
requesting mention of the material's SBC origins.
If
you have a friend who wants to get future copies of the North American
Swarovski Birding E-bulletin, have them contact:
Wayne Petersen 781/293-9730, wayne.petersen@swarovskibirding.com
OR Paul Baicich 410/992-9736, paul.baicich@swarovskibirding.com
If
you DON'T wish to receive these E-bulletins, contact either of us,
and we will take you off our mailing list IMMEDIATELY.
|